Building collect2 for C?

[E. Weddington]

On 16 Mar 2004 at 11:38, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

> > No, not really. The real bug that I'm trying to work around is 14316 above.
> > 14316 contains a link to a discussion from over a year ago between Zack and DJ
> > about Zack's proposed patch. I don't fully understand the reasons DJ gave for
> > blocking that patch: I can't tell from that discussion whether it's an
> > objection based on libiberty itself, or an objection based on that the
> > proposed patch doesn't work for DJGPP. 
> 
> Zack's patch is, in my opinion, poorly written.  I pointed out the
> right way to do it a while back.
> 
> Since this came up again, I'm working on what I consider to be a
> correct patch.  I'll send it out later today.
> 

Thanks for your help in this. It's very much appreciated!

Eric