PCH and exec-shield...
David Edelsohn
dje@watson.ibm.com
Tue Mar 16 04:15:00 GMT 2004
>>>>> Mike Stump writes:
Mike> Using a feature that serves no purpose other than to slow down
Mike> compilations can reasonably be considered a bug. By having PCH swizzle
Mike> on load, we permit the introductions of bugs into the compiler. This
Mike> is bad. This is why it hasn't been done.
How does swizzling pointers on load only when the PCH file could
not be loaded at its original location slow down compilations and serve no
purpose? Please make sure that you are considering the entire context of
the proposal.
David
More information about the Gcc
mailing list