statement expressions and extended asm bug?

[Nathan Sidwell]

Gunther Nikl wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 02:03:10PM +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> 
>>It is your explicit allocation of the two temporary variables into the
>>same register that is breaking things.
> 
> 
>   Ok, thats what I wanted to know. So, if I assign the temporary explict
>   register variable containing the result to a non-register variable, then
>   the expressions become well-formed and don't violate other constraints,
>   right?
If you are asking whether
   ({int i; int j __asm__("d0"); volatile asm ("..." : "=r"(j)...); i = j; i;})
will DTRT, the answer is no.

If you are asking something else, you'll have to rephrase it.

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk