IMA vs tree-ssa

Paul Jarc prj@po.cwru.edu
Tue Mar 9 02:53:00 GMT 2004


Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
>        46)Two types need not be identical to be compatible.
>
> meaning you may have compatible types that are not equal.

Equality is not the only equivalence relation.  Compatibility might be
intended to be an equivalence relation, without being intended to be
the same as equality.


paul



More information about the Gcc mailing list