more m68k breakage on m68k-linux

[Bernardo Innocenti]

Gunther Nikl wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> 
>>Roman Zippel wrote:
>>
>>>Does your patch look very different from the one below?
>>>That's the one I'm testing for m68k-linux right now.
>>
>>It's similar, but I didn't notice REGNO_REG_CLASS also needed fiddling,
>>so your patch is superior.
> 
> 
>   Why are so many changes required to fix the breakage caused by adding
>   argptr?

Because the target configuration infrastructure used by
GCC is a hell ofpreprocessor macros with very weak
consistency checking? :-)

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/