gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue

[Jim Wilson]

On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 06:46, Andrew Haley wrote:
> could either be the start of the epilogue or the end of the funtion
> proper.  This is my best guess.

Either seems reasonable for now.  We can always move it later if this
turns out to be the wrong place.

> 	* function.c (expand_function_end): Emit a blockage insn before
> 	the epilogue when -fnon-call-exceptions is used.

OK.

This needs to be sent to gcc-patches.

I prefer the ??? convention over the @@@ one.  ??? is used in 10 places
already in function.c, and there are no uses of @@@.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com