Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?

[Mark Mitchell]

Richard Sandiford wrote:

>>I suggest reverting it, waiting to see what breaks, and then properly
>>documenting the problem that the patch supposedly fixes.
>  
> Gets my vote too.  I see no reason to test N % FP_INC or mips_abi here.
> When using paired 32-bit registers, if a double argument is passed
> in $f12, $f13 is used as well.

I agree.

Richard, are you in a position to test the change thoroughly?

Or shall I just check it in as an obvious fix?

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com