<built-in> vs <internal>
Zack Weinberg
zack@codesourcery.com
Mon Jun 28 21:06:00 GMT 2004
Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:
> While initializing, some code (including cpplib) sets the
> current filename to "<built-in>" while other code (including
> c_init_decl_processing) uses "<internal>". What is the
> distinction? Any reason not to use "<built-in>" consistently?
I don't think there's any difference, just a change in preferred
terminology over time. I'd approve a patch that changed everything to
use "<built-in>" (or "<internal>", don't care which).
zw
More information about the Gcc
mailing list