Bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 on GNU/Linux x86

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Mon Jun 28 08:20:00 GMT 2004


Ranjit Mathew wrote:

>Eric Botcazou wrote:
>  
>
>>>This doesn't make sense because the member function in question reads:
>>>
>>> inline long double&
>>> complex<long double>::real()
>>> { return __real__ _M_value; }                   // line 1296
>>>
>>>And _M_value does have type __complex__ long double.  Should I start a
>>>binary search, or is this known to be some kind of recent breakage?
>>>      
>>>
>>Could be Mark's latest patch to the parser.
>>    
>>
>
>AFAICT, yes - I was able to proceed with the bootstrap once
>I reverted:
>
>  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg02268.html
>
>(on i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>  
>
I've checked in yet another fix here, and tests are running -- but I did 
get past building V3.

2004-06-28  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
                                                                                

        * parser.c (cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type): Fix thinko.
                                                                                


-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diffs
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20040628/b919359e/attachment.ksh>


More information about the Gcc mailing list