Bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 on GNU/Linux x86
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Mon Jun 28 08:20:00 GMT 2004
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
>Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
>
>>>This doesn't make sense because the member function in question reads:
>>>
>>> inline long double&
>>> complex<long double>::real()
>>> { return __real__ _M_value; } // line 1296
>>>
>>>And _M_value does have type __complex__ long double. Should I start a
>>>binary search, or is this known to be some kind of recent breakage?
>>>
>>>
>>Could be Mark's latest patch to the parser.
>>
>>
>
>AFAICT, yes - I was able to proceed with the bootstrap once
>I reverted:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg02268.html
>
>(on i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
I've checked in yet another fix here, and tests are running -- but I did
get past building V3.
2004-06-28 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
* parser.c (cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type): Fix thinko.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diffs
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20040628/b919359e/attachment.ksh>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list