Bugzilla bug id 16223

[Erik de Castro Lopo]

Hi all,

I've just received notification that the above bug raised by me has
had its status changed to RESOLVED/INVALID belyshev at lubercy dot com.

Belyshev suggest thats my code is invalid (without realising that this
is a small snippet of a much larger piece of code) and suggests that I 
use the round() function instead of floor().

However, if I do replace floor() with round() in the code I posted, I
still see exactly the same symptom with gcc-3.4 and I don't see it
with gcc-3.3. The regression remains!

Can someone please reopen this bug and take a look at the REAL issue
I have raised.

Thank you,
Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo  nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Open Source and Free Software means that you never sacrifice quality
of the code for meeting deadlines set up by people not participating
directly in the software development process.