proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis

[Jan Hubicka]

> > On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 18:08, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > 
> > > However the mainline might be good as well as we already do have
> > > functions gimplified at the time cgraph_analize is called (ie when you
> > > would like to do the analysis).
> > >
> > Really?  Then why do we call the gimplifier as one of the tree
> > optimization passes?  That makes things easier then.  But the bodies are
> We call it only when GIMPLE_BEFORE_INLINING is false, but it is true for
> all existing backends except for fortran, but fortran also gimplify.  I
> would vote to drop this code.

Actually looking closer to fortran, it does gimplify only nested
functions, so we re-gimplify just those.  Still I don't see any win
in not gimplifying early always.  What about changing mainline this way?

Honza