Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees)

[Daniel Berlin]

> k, i'm a lawyer, and even i wouldn't lawyer someone to the degree that 
> seems to be going on here.
>
>>
>> So far your only point has been that bootstrapping to a virgin system
>> would be harder. (a) it's hard full stop (b) the ada compiler is in 
>> ada
>> which appears to be a more complicated language than C++, and it 
>> manages
>> to do such bootstraps.
> n
> And I might add, GDB doesn't even support Ada in the main tree right 
> now, last i looked (5.x through 6.x), while it does support C++, so 
> debugging
						^
						it isn't even easy for a normal person with the regular required 
tools, they have to go out and get a special version of gdb.

>