named warnings & individual warning control

Tue Jun 22 19:06:00 GMT 2004

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

>> -std=c90 shouldn't cause errors.
>
> But -std in conjunction with -pedantic might, yes?  Can we say for
> sure that there will never be a single option that enables both errors
> and warnings at the same time?

That's what -pedantic-errors is for.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, MaxfeldstraÃŸe 5, 90409 NÃ¼rnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."