mudflap versus cgraph

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Tue Jun 22 17:36:00 GMT 2004


On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 09:14:04PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> It might be acceptable to wind the enqueue/emit logic into cgraph itself,

I very very much want to do this.  I got stuck with c++...

> provided that we could figure out how to construct a function in a
> completely language-independent manner (which we need anyway).

We have gimple/generic.  We *can* create completely languages
independent functions now.

>         .section .rodata.mf.statics, "a"
>         .long x
>         .long 4

This is pic-safe if you put it in a writeable section.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list