mudflap versus cgraph
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Tue Jun 22 17:36:00 GMT 2004
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 09:14:04PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> It might be acceptable to wind the enqueue/emit logic into cgraph itself,
I very very much want to do this. I got stuck with c++...
> provided that we could figure out how to construct a function in a
> completely language-independent manner (which we need anyway).
We have gimple/generic. We *can* create completely languages
independent functions now.
> .section .rodata.mf.statics, "a"
> .long x
> .long 4
This is pic-safe if you put it in a writeable section.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list