Regressions on mainline\
Jan Hubicka
jh@suse.cz
Tue Jun 22 09:29:00 GMT 2004
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> >This was almost likely caused by:
> >
> >
> Thanks for analyzing.
>
> >2004-04-28 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
> >
> > PR c/15004
> > * function.c (do_warn_unused_parameter): Break out form ...
> > (expand_function_end): ... here; warn only when not using
> > cgraphunit.
> > * function.h (do_warn_unused_parameter): Declare.
> > * cgraphunit.c: Include function.h.
> > (cgraph_finalize_function): Do unused parameter warning.
> > * Makefile.in (cgraphunit.o): Depend on function.h
> >But I think it is a C++ front-end bug which deals with cloning as it is
> >not warning about
> >an unused parameter in a constructor.
> >
> Whether or not that is true, it is Jan's responsibility to deal with the
> problem.
>
> It is not acceptable to completely ignore this kind of breakage
> indefinitely. Two months is far too long.
I was completely unaware of any testsuite regressions caused by this
patch (it definitly passed full testing on i686 according to the logs).
I will try to look into it soon (I need to prioritize things now, so I
will look on it after the 3.4.1 problems)
Honza
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell
> CodeSourcery, LLC
> (916) 791-8304
> mark@codesourcery.com
>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list