[RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets

[Ben Elliston]

Steven Bosscher <steven@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

> So for 3 out of seven ports, 4 (more than half of them!) use one or
> more unofficically obsoleted interfaces (where both cris and ip2k
> don't have a scheduler description _at_all_, which basically means
> they implicitly use the old pipeline description), and we apparently
> don't even know if an actual implementation of the hardware exists.

This URL:

  http://www.scenix.com/processors/ip2000-family.htm

suggests that a silicon implementation does exist.  In fact, a friend
who develops embedded systems recently mentioned looking into using
this chip.

Ben