[RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets

[tm_gccmail@kloo.net]

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Dave Hudson wrote:

> FWIW there was no scheduler description becaust there is nothing 
> interesting to describe.  If someone has a dummy scheduler description 
> that does precisely nothing and they'd prefer this port to use then I'd 
> be more than happy to generate the patches :-)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Dave

You should probably turn off the scheduling passes (if you haven't
already) to save compilation time, in this case...

Toshi