Deep CSE bug!
Dave Korn
dk@artimi.com
Fri Jun 18 09:04:00 GMT 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of Jie Zhang
> Sent: 18 June 2004 04:25
> To: Dave Korn
> Cc: gcc
> Subject: Re: Deep CSE bug!
>
> Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. I see that Jie Zhang had pretty much this exact
> same problem over a
> > year ago, but I can't find any followups to this post:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-04/msg01397.html
> >
>
> I just worked around it by defining the "movdi" pattern.
>
>
> --
> Jie
Thankyou Jie, I guess I'll have to try that.
Does really nobody have anything to say about the semantics of REQ_EQUAL
on SETs of SUBREGs? The internals menu talks about the case where you have
a STRICT_LOW_PART of a SUBREG but doesn't say anything about the plain
SUBREG case. I would have thought the mode of the expression in the note
ought to be the same as the mode of the SUBREG rather than the inner REG,
perhaps?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
More information about the Gcc
mailing list