gcc news #2

[Mathieu Lacage]

On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 19:54, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> 
> > AFAIK, the ISO form is YYYY-MM-DD, but using 2004-June-14 is certainly
> > an unambigous format, as is Joe's format.
> 
> I would encourage the general use of the ISO format, which is 
> unambiguous and avoids names of months, which are curiously
> different across languages.

I picked ISO since this is what I use most often and is unambiguous.

Thanks to all for pointing this out.

Mathieu
-- 
Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@sophia.inria.fr>