stmt.c:expand_stack_alloc

[Richard Kenner]

There's a comment in there saying that in function-at-a-time mode,
variable_size doesn't expand something.  But isn't that comment
irrelevant now that tree-ssa has been merged?  Wouldn't that
expand_expr call be wrong?

And if it's right, then why isn't it being called for TYPE_MIN_VALUE
as well?  You can have a variable-sized object because either of the
values is non-constant.