More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Sun Jun 6 20:42:00 GMT 2004
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 01:24:37PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> It seems wrong to pass &tmp to gimplify_expr: don't you need to actually
> update the value in TYPE_SIZE_UNIT so that when it's used, what's there
> is GIMPLE?
No, because the SAVE_EXPR gets gimplified, which only changes the
internals of the SAVE_EXPR. That said, I see no particular reason
we have to retain the SAVE_EXPR in the TYPE_SIZE_UNIT field, so it
seems like we're making things more complex for no particular reason.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list