Criteria for GCC 4.0

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:

[...]

| I'm not arguing for /never/ having a 4.0 release (although others do take
| that position, and it's a reasonable one).  I'm arguing that mainline,
| today, right now, does not qualify.

The way your argumentation comes to me is that by the time we'll have
4.0.0, C or C++ would have already been replaced with quantum computing
programming languages in common places.

-- Gaby