Criteria for GCC 4.0

[Joe Buck]

On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 04:03:50AM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> The recurring 3.5-vs-4.0 thing is sure to come up, so I thought I'd
> generate some discussion by providing my opinion, and talking points,
> on why we don't have 4.0 material yet.
> 
>     http://www.jaj.com/space/phil/40.html

You quote me but you might be confused about my position.  I said that
using 4.0 vs 3.5 is basically marketing, but that does NOT mean I was
arguing against 4.0.

Unfortunately I won't be able to make it to Ottawa.  If I had my
"druthers", it would be 4.0, and possibly we'd slip the schedule to help
make sure that we get the quality up enough to make a real splash.