[tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

[Diego Novillo]

On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 05:25, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> I'm happy to help out with testing, but I don't have enough bandwidth to 
> do much more than fix trivial issues that are ARM-specific.
> 
That's plenty.  Thanks.  If there's anything else odd you notice, could
you file a PR?


> The ARM compiler doesn't build at all -- RTH's change to nested function 
> support has left arm.c uncompilable -- the changes are (I think) pretty 
> trivial, but there are so many other problems at this time that I can't 
> even test what I think is the right change.  That patch broke *at least* 
> two back ends.
> 
I believe these are similar to the H8 breakage that Kazu fixed
yesterday.  Is this what you're referring to?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-02/msg02311.html

> The fortran compiler doesn't run on the systems I have -- see the GMP 
> thread above.
> 
OK.  We'll have to figure out what to do with GMP.  I also believe that
pulling it in GCC's tree may be the better solution.  Toon?  Paul?

> The build system tries to build libmudflap with pthread calls.  An arm-elf 
> target is never going to support pthreads (it's for bare-metal systems).  
> Consequently it's impossible to build the libjava or objc libraries.
> 
Could you file a PR for this, if one doesn't exist yet?


Thanks.  Diego.