What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch?
Karel Gardas
kgardas@objectsecurity.com
Tue Feb 24 22:29:00 GMT 2004
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Eric Christopher wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 02:28, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm curious what's wrong with mips-elf[1] platform on gcc-3_4-branch since
> > comparison of its results with arm-elf[2] and sh-elf[3] submited by
> > Joern Rennecke doesn't looks good for mips-elf, i.e. there are a lot of
> > ``compilation failed to produce executable'' errors.
> >
>
> Likely a bug in the default sim tester. I'm building the branch up just
> in case, but..
>
> (the answer btw is that the linker script needs to be passed -Tidt.ld,
> not -Wl,-Tidt.ld)
Will you correct it? I've built mips-elf[1] and mipsisa64-elf[2] with the
same results from todays sources.
Thanks,
Karel
[1]: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-02/msg01216.html
[2]: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-02/msg01224.html
--
Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list