Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Thu Feb 19 02:13:00 GMT 2004


On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:15:55PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I don't think it is possible for this to change at runtime...

I thought maybe it might change based on -march switches,
particularly the presence or absence of the second register.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list