Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12]

[David Daney]

Joe Buck wrote:

>On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:10:23PM +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>  
>
>>David Daney wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Is it really the right-thing to make it fail under 3.4?
>>>      
>>>
>>Yes, because it's not standard C++, and we're trying to cut on the extensions.
>>As suggested by Florian, please open a bugreport about:
>>
>>- Missing entry in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html for this change,
>>since it appears to be very common.
>>- Enhancement request for the diagnostic.
>>    
>>
>
>I think that the lack of a decent diagnostic for this should be considered
>a bug, not an enhancement request.
> 
>  
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14181