How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets?
Kazu Hirata
kazu@cs.umass.edu
Sat Feb 14 02:55:00 GMT 2004
Hi,
While converting h8300 port to MODE_CC, I encountered the following
sequence.
;; move r1 to r0, while testing r1
(parallel [(set (reg:SI 0 r0)
(reg:SI 1 r1))
(set (reg:CC 12 cc)
(compare:CC (reg:SI 1 r1)
(const_int 0)))])
;; test r1
(set (reg:CC 12 cc)
(compare:CC (reg:SI 1 r1)
(const_int 0)))
;; jump depending on CC
(set (pc)
(if_then_else (eq (reg:CC 12 cc)
(const_int 0))
(label_ref 17)
(pc)))
Note that the second insn isn't necessary because the first one does
the same as a side effect of the move insn. With -O2, the first insn
didn't go away. Does anybody know how aggressive CSE is about
removing redundant CC sets?
Thanks,
Kazu Hirata
More information about the Gcc
mailing list