-shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Fri Feb 13 19:47:00 GMT 2004
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 11:33:13AM -0800, Matt Austern wrote:
> The reason I'm harping on this: if you accept my paraphrase, then I
> don't see why we have two switches instead of one. One switch is a
> binary choice between two alternatives. Two switches is a choice
> between four alternatives.
No, *maximally* four alternatives. In reality, between three
alternatives: force-shared, force-static, default. The default
depends on language and executable/shared-library link output.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list