C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x

[Robert Dewar]

Kai Henningsen wrote:

>> in a project
>>which has
>>
>>	Open Source
>>
>>as its main goal.
> 
> 
> Does anyone think there is anything else to this that this guy's utter  
> cluelessness to what "unnamed and anonymous structs and unions" actually  
> are? It sure sounds to me like he's just going off on the name of the  
> features without even the slightest idea about what the features actually  
> are. Why else would he put that in the same pot as binary only modules? I  
> sure can't see any *actual* connection here.

Not to mention the provocative claim that GNU has "open source" as its
main goal :-)