"Documentation by paper"

[Daniel Berlin]

On Feb 11, 2004, at 7:30 AM, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> Someone mentioned something that wasn't related to the thread, which 
>> is
>> that they thought they read in a paper that a certain algorithm
>> required useless phi nodes.
>> I responded that I had provided evidence to contradict this.
>
> You have not provided such evidence.

Pardon?
Look through the archives.

>
> What makes you think we read the same paper or the same algorithm?

I provided numbers for SSAPRE, SSA-CCP, and a few other algorithms 
which claimed they needed extraneous phi nodes.
--Dan