What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Feb 4, 2004, at 06:18, Robert Dewar wrote:

> It certainly seems unfortunate that tree-ssa removes a
> critical (well documented :-) part of gcc functionality,
> and this omission may well cause significant delays
> in bringing Ada up to tree-ssa level. Are there any
> other features that are being removed like this?


Should really PLACEHOLDER_EXPR be done in the front-end
and be expanded to what it really does in gimplify stage
which every other language needs to do with its language
specific trees.


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski