C99 usage in gcc

[Joe Buck]

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:21:49PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:
> 
> > In 3.4 we permit the unmatched ' because of many complaints, so
> > perhaps we should conditionalize the // warnings on !skipping.
> > I'd be OK with that.
> 
> I'd be OK with that too.  I can think of cases where the meaning of
> the program silently changes but they're all pretty pathological.

Good, I think that this is the right solution.