Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Tue Dec 14 00:26:00 GMT 2004
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 December 2004 01:03, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> (on compile time not in the criteria...)
>
>>Partly, that's because this isn't something that's easy to fix right
>>before a release. If you want to fix it, you have to deal with it
>>during the earlier development stages, when there's more flux.
>
>
> Then release criteria should be available before stage3, and more
> people would have to care about it. Probably the latter is a bit
> more important (volunteers, blahblah).
> In fact I think that getting release criteria so late in stage 3
> is just silly and quite pointless, especially now that they are in
> such a weak form and not very specific.
I agree; we should have done this earlier. Several people still
requested it, so I think "pointless" is too strong a statement, but I
agree that it is less pointful than it would have been done had we done
it earlier. :-)
> For 4.0 there isn't anything that can be done about it; but could
> the SC/RM set release criteria for 4.1 early on in the development
> cycle? I really liked the projects list that Mark did before we
> went into stage3.
Yes, we'll be doing that in Stage 1 for 4.1.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304
More information about the Gcc
mailing list