Size of basic types

[Paul Schlie]

> Zack Weinberg writes:
>>Jean-Eric Cuendet <jec@rptec.ch> writes:
>> Hi,
>> I work under 64 bits Linux on AMD64 and GCC 3.4
>> I have:
>> int => 32
>> long => 64
>> long long => 64
>> void* => 64
>>
>> Is it possible to have:
>> int => 32
>> long => 32
>> long long => 64
>> void* => 64
>
> No.  This will never be supported

Do you mean GCC can't support the desired type size specification for some
reason; or that it's not consistent Linux's 64-bit kernel/library API type
size requirements/assumptions?