Size of basic types
Zack Weinberg
zack@codesourcery.com
Thu Dec 2 21:11:00 GMT 2004
Jean-Eric Cuendet <jec@rptec.ch> writes:
>>>Is it possible to have:
>>>int => 32
>>>long => 32
>>>long long => 64
>>>void* => 64
>> No. This will never be supported.
>
> OK, thanks for your quick answer.
> But is it possible in GCC to define my custom types.
> Saying:
> newtype MyInt [32bits]
> or something like that?
> I can not do a typedef.
Not in C or any of the related languages. I believe Ada has something
along these lines.
> My main problem is that:
> On 32bits platform:
> OurBool => int => 32bits
> OurInt => long => 32bits
> OurLong => long long => 64bits
> But in 64 bits:
> OurBool => int => 32bits
> OurInt => long => 64bits <=== The problem
> OurLong => long long => 64bits
>
> So I changed OurInt to int instead of long. But then, I have problems
> because we have overloaded methods with OurInt and OurBool, which were
> different in 32bits mode (int and long) but are the same now in 64bits
> (the 2 are int)...
> Any idea how to resolve that?
Change OurBool to some other type (the real bool comes to mind)?
zw
More information about the Gcc
mailing list