RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot?

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:27:17PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> >As it stands, -isysroot only affects header include search path.
> >The name is then right: for me, the leading "i" stands for
> >include path.  However, it's not really useful (at a glance at
> >least);
> 
> We find it useful.

Could you give an example?  Most of the time I've needed to use a
different set of headers, I've wanted a different set of libraries too.
That's why there's a single --with-sysroot option for both.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz