Ada policy

[Zack Weinberg]

kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:

> The point is what to do with the FSF tree with respect to fixes for
> bugs for which no resources are available to make a non-proprietary
> test case.  Should the fix for the bug not be propagated to the FSF
> tree?  I see no argument in favor of doing that.

For the record, I'm fine with putting the fix in the FSF tree and
declaring that there is a test case but it's proprietary code, in 
this circumstance.  However, developing non-encumbered test cases
is certainly a Good Thing, and IMO worth spending time on.

It sounds like you have a regression test harness internally; would
it be practical to clean that up and contribute it?

zw