libcpp's aclocal.m4 regeneration question. Also is it time for atoplevel "m4" directory?

[Nathanael Nerode]

Kelley Cook wrote:

>Also now that we are moving to automake 1.9, shouldn't we be split out all the
>extra macros we use into individual files within a toplevel m4 directory as
>the automake people recommend? The generated aclocal and configure would
>become very small if we were to follow that advice.

We spell that directory "config/".  :-)

Yes, any m4/autoconf macros used in more than one directory probably belong in
files in config/.

-- 
This space intentionally left blank.