Stage 3 and current breakage
Zack Weinberg
zack@codesourcery.com
Tue Aug 10 04:08:00 GMT 2004
Andrew Pinski <apinski@apple.com> writes:
> I would request a week or two of stage 3 starting today because the
> number of regressions is just huge. Even though this will only give
> us one week for the rest of stage 2 but we can then push that
> back. The main reason why I am asking for because bootstrap on powerpc
> -apple-darwin is broken and has been broken on and off for the last
> three weeks (mainly on the weekends when I do my non-work related GCC
> work).
>
> Note stage 3 in my mind does not mean optimization can be
> added/removed, this means all of the LNO merging should stop during
> this period. If we do not fix some of these bugs now, we would just
> push them further back.
I'd like to endorse this general idea. Alternating short periods of
stage 2 and 3 would allow me (and I doubt I'm alone in this boat) to
put time into fixing regressions now, rather than needing to ignore
them and concentrate on the features I was supposed to wedge into 3.5.
And as we all know, the longer bugs go unfixed, the harder it tends to
be to fix them.
zw
More information about the Gcc
mailing list