Semantics of MODIFY_EXPR with CONSTRUCTOR rhs

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Mon Aug 2 22:56:00 GMT 2004


On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:54:17PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> I'm currently testing the following for gimplify_init_ctor_preeval:

Looks good.

>      with the lhs, since "a = { .x=a }" doesn't make sense.  This will be
>      always be true for all scalars, since is_gimple_mem_rhs insists on a

Please fix my "be always be" mistake in your local copy.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list