Copy constructor revisited

[Nathan Sidwell]

Robert Schweikert wrote:

> Could you please be more explicit in your explanation? I appreciate the
> answer, unfortunately I am completely lost trying to understand what it
> means.
[11.5], I was wrong about it having to be the derived this pointer, but it
must be an A within a B object.

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk