gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice

[John David Anglin]

> I think the test should be xfailed on hppa64.

I just happened to have a tested patch ready to xfail this test on hppa64.
Tested on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.  Committed to 3.5.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)

2004-04-16  John David Anglin  <dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>

	* gcc.dg/funcorder.c: xfail hppa*64*-*-*.

Index: gcc.dg/funcorder.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/funcorder.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -3 -p -r1.2 funcorder.c
--- gcc.dg/funcorder.c	13 Mar 2003 03:54:27 -0000	1.2
+++ gcc.dg/funcorder.c	16 Apr 2004 20:51:53 -0000
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -funit-at-a-time" } */
-/* { dg-final { if [ istarget hppa*-*-* ] { scan-assembler-not "link_error,%r" } else { scan-assembler-not "link_error" } } } */
+/* { dg-final { if [ istarget hppa*-*-* ] { scan-assembler-not "link_error,%r" { xfail hppa*64*-*-* } } else { scan-assembler-not "link_error" } } } */
 /*  In unit-at-time the functions should be assembled in order
-    e q t main, so we realize that they are pure.  */
+    e q t main, so we realize that they are pure.  The test is
+    xfailed on hppa64 because variable r in q is sign extended
+    to 64-bits.  As a result, "if (t!=mem)" is not simplified.  */
  
 static int mem;
 static int e(void) __attribute__ ((noinline));