On Apr 8, 2004, at 12:13 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> I think that tree-ssa is a large enough change to justify moving to >> 4.0. >> >> It's certainly a larger change than from GCC 2 to GCC 3 and from GCC 1 >> to GCC 2. > > If it's a larger change, shouldn't the new GCC be named GCC 5 instead? > Or GCC '04 Or GCC XP or GCC Enterprise Edition