bugzilla voting

[Scott Robert Ladd]

Per Abrahamsen wrote:
> I should have specified "free software projects".  The expectations
> are different for unfree software, where lobbying often is the only
> way to affect the development.

Ah, but isn't this contradicted by Mr. Dewar's argument (and yours 
below) that lobby has no value unless accompanied by money?

SRL>I would like to see a voting system, so long as there are
SRL>reasonable assurances that the vote has some value.

> That sentiment would be an argument against enabling voting.  I
> certainly would not want to give assurances any stronger than that I
> just *might* take votes into account occasionally.

If that is your attitude, and it reflects the attitude of other primary 
GCC developers, then voting or lobbying are indeed meaningless.


-- 
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Software Invention for High-Performance Computing