Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build
Andi Kleen
ak@suse.de
Thu Apr 1 20:46:00 GMT 2004
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:39:23 -0500
Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> wrote:
> >
>
> (I haven't tested anything but...) why should this fix it? Ulrich's
> problem happens when the .o file is flushed from the cache, and then
> stat'd; it now appears to be older than the .c file. With a change to
> round up instead, if the .c file is flushed from the cache before the
> .o, the .c will still suddenly appear to be newer than the .o.
That is what he wants I think. It's logically just like taking a bit longer.
-Andi
More information about the Gcc
mailing list