No Subject

[Nathanael Nerode]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim Wilson wrote:
| On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:41, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
|
|>>I have a patch which tests for build!=host and disables WARN_CFLAGS,
|>>but should fixinc *ever* be built with WARN_CFLAGS?
|>
|>No, it shouldn't.
|
|
| I think this is an over simplistic answer.  You really should be looking
| more closely at this issue if you want to comment on it.
|
| With a native configure, BUILD_CFLAGS includes ALL_CFLAGS which includes
| WARN_CFLAGS which includes GCC_WARN_CFLAGS which includes STRICT_WARN
| and maybe also STRICT2_WARN.  So clearly, the warning flags are used
| when building fixinc in some cases, and that should not be broken.
Oh, it's OK to use the warning flags for fixinc, but it's neither
necessary nor terribly valuable -- I feel that they arrived essentially
by accident.  Long term, the plan was to put fixinc in its own top level
directory.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAa9K9RGZ0aC4lkIIRAmw9AJ9wG+CCfyrNXuC46rzP08nJXneLVgCeJIaw
kTa+damTHIkbd11lwxfCeZQ=
=2Qpm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----