-Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question)
law@redhat.com
law@redhat.com
Fri Oct 24 21:03:00 GMT 2003
In message <1067022652.31435.63.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>, Mark Mitch
ell writes:
>The other problem is that it's not clear to me that this approach gives
>you the completely right answer either. It tells you when something is
>different -- but not when a chance will result in some derived class
>being different. There are actually a fair number of places where 3.2
>would do the same thing with the base class -- but some follow-on
>derived class would differ.
That's been a concern as well -- deriving classes from something in our
headers. The "dump the offsets" idea works great for internal consistency,
but doesn't help when external code derives classes.
[ Though presumably you could run the tester on the external code as well :-) ]
Jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list