Possibility of 3.3.3 and what to do with bugzilla

[Wolfgang Bangerth]

In his announcement of 3.3.2
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg00742.html
Mark indicated that a gcc 3.3.3 is unlikely. I and others have closed incoming 
PRs that are 3.3-branch-only based on this, but I wonder whether this was 
premature.

So, what are we going to do with
- PRs that are fixed on mainline but still exist on the 3.3 branch
- should we still indicate regressions on both lines with
     [3.3/3.4 regression]
  or should we only mention 3.4 is the summary line?
We can of course just keep with existing practice until we make a final 
decision. But maybe that has already been taken?

W.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/