No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa

[Zack Weinberg]

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

> On Oct 20, 2003, "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> I think this was mostly successful, but I'm not going to maintain
>> another such branch during this release cycle, because it would
>> increase the amount of work required to bring in the tree-ssa branch
>> at the beginning of the 3.5 development period.
>
> Why not just use the tree-ssa branch as the `basic improvements
> branch' for this round?  It has been regarded as 3.5-to-be for quite a
> while AFAIK.

That's what I was suggesting.
zw